Fiveable

🎡AP Physics 1 (2025) Unit 6 Review

QR code for AP Physics 1 (2025) practice questions

6.1 Rotational Kinetic Energy

🎡AP Physics 1 (2025)
Unit 6 Review

6.1 Rotational Kinetic Energy

Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated September 2025
Verified for the 2026 exam
Verified for the 2026 examWritten by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated September 2025
🎡AP Physics 1 (2025)
Unit & Topic Study Guides
Pep mascot

Rotational kinetic energy is a crucial concept in physics, describing the energy of rotating objects. It's calculated using the equation K = 1/2Iω², where I is rotational inertia and ω is angular velocity.

Understanding rotational kinetic energy helps explain how objects store energy through rotation. It's essential for analyzing spinning systems, from flywheels to planets, and complements translational kinetic energy in describing motion.

angular and linear speed

Rotational kinetic energy of rigid systems

Rotating objects store energy in their spinning motion. This energy depends on both how fast the object rotates and how its mass is distributed.

  • Calculated using the formula K=12Iω2K=\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 where I is rotational inertia and ω is angular velocity
  • Larger objects with mass distributed far from the rotation axis have greater rotational inertia
  • Faster rotation (higher angular velocity) increases rotational energy exponentially due to the squared term
Pep mascot
more resources to help you study

Equation for rotational kinetic energy

The fundamental equation K=12Iω2K=\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 mirrors the formula for translational kinetic energy but uses rotational equivalents.

  • The formula structure mimics translational kinetic energy (K=12mv2K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2) with rotational inertia replacing mass and angular velocity replacing linear velocity
  • Rotational inertia (I) depends on both the object's mass and its distribution relative to the rotation axis
  • Angular velocity (ω) measures how quickly the object rotates in radians per second

Rotational vs translational kinetic energy

A rigid object can possess rotational kinetic energy even when its center of mass isn't moving through space.

  • A spinning basketball on your fingertip has rotational energy but no translational energy
  • Each particle in a rotating object follows a circular path, giving it individual linear velocity despite the stationary center of mass
  • The sum of all these individual kinetic energies equals the rotational kinetic energy

Total kinetic energy of rigid systems

Real-world objects often combine both rotational and translational motion, requiring us to calculate their total energy.

  • Total kinetic energy equals the sum of translational and rotational components: Ktotal=12mv2+12Iω2K_{total} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2
  • A rolling ball has both types of energy - it's moving forward and spinning
  • For a perfectly rolling object without slipping, these energies maintain a fixed ratio based on the object's geometry

Rotational energy with stationary center of mass

Understanding how objects can have energy while appearing stationary helps explain many physical phenomena.

  • A spinning top demonstrates rotational energy despite its fixed position on a surface
  • A gyroscope maintains stability through conservation of angular momentum while its center remains stationary
  • The Earth rotates on its axis, giving it enormous rotational energy even though its center of mass follows a nearly fixed path around the Sun

Scalar nature of rotational energy

Energy quantities like rotational kinetic energy have magnitude but no direction, making them scalar values.

  • You can add energies directly without considering direction
  • This differs from vector quantities like angular velocity which require directional components
  • The scalar nature allows for direct energy conservation calculations and simplifies energy transfer analysis

Practice Problem 1: Rotational Kinetic Energy

A solid sphere with mass 2.0 kg and radius 0.15 m rotates at an angular velocity of 5.0 rad/s about an axis through its center. Calculate its rotational kinetic energy. The moment of inertia of a solid sphere is I=25mr2I = \frac{2}{5}mr^2.

To solve this problem:

  1. Identify the given values:
  • Mass (m) = 2.0 kg
  • Radius (r) = 0.15 m
  • Angular velocity (ω) = 5.0 rad/s
  • Moment of inertia formula: I=25mr2I = \frac{2}{5}mr^2
  1. Calculate the moment of inertia: I=25mr2=25×2.0×(0.15)2=25×2.0×0.0225=0.018 kgm2I = \frac{2}{5}mr^2 = \frac{2}{5} \times 2.0 \times (0.15)^2 = \frac{2}{5} \times 2.0 \times 0.0225 = 0.018 \text{ kg} \cdot \text{m}^2

  2. Calculate the rotational kinetic energy: K=12Iω2=12×0.018×(5.0)2=0.225 JK = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 = \frac{1}{2} \times 0.018 \times (5.0)^2 = 0.225 \text{ J}

The rotational kinetic energy of the sphere is 0.225 joules.

Practice Problem 2: Combined Kinetic Energy

A solid cylinder with mass 5.0 kg and radius 0.10 m rolls without slipping along a horizontal surface with a linear speed of 3.0 m/s. Calculate the total kinetic energy of the cylinder. The moment of inertia of a solid cylinder about its central axis is I=12mr2I = \frac{1}{2}mr^2.

To solve this problem:

  1. Identify the given values:
  • Mass (m) = 5.0 kg
  • Radius (r) = 0.10 m
  • Linear speed (v) = 3.0 m/s
  • Moment of inertia formula: I=12mr2I = \frac{1}{2}mr^2
  1. For rolling without slipping, the relationship between linear and angular speed is: v=rωv = r\omega or ω=vr=3.00.10=30 rad/s\omega = \frac{v}{r} = \frac{3.0}{0.10} = 30 \text{ rad/s}

  2. Calculate the moment of inertia: I=12mr2=12×5.0×(0.10)2=0.025 kgm2I = \frac{1}{2}mr^2 = \frac{1}{2} \times 5.0 \times (0.10)^2 = 0.025 \text{ kg} \cdot \text{m}^2

  3. Calculate the translational kinetic energy: Ktrans=12mv2=12×5.0×(3.0)2=22.5 JK_{trans} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{1}{2} \times 5.0 \times (3.0)^2 = 22.5 \text{ J}

  4. Calculate the rotational kinetic energy: Krot=12Iω2=12×0.025×(30)2=11.25 JK_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 = \frac{1}{2} \times 0.025 \times (30)^2 = 11.25 \text{ J}

  5. Calculate the total kinetic energy: Ktotal=Ktrans+Krot=22.5+11.25=33.75 JK_{total} = K_{trans} + K_{rot} = 22.5 + 11.25 = 33.75 \text{ J}

The total kinetic energy of the rolling cylinder is 33.75 joules.

Practice Problem 3: Energy Conservation

A solid sphere with mass 1.0 kg and radius 0.20 m is released from rest at the top of a ramp that is 0.50 m high. Assuming the sphere rolls without slipping and ignoring friction, what is its total kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp? The moment of inertia of a solid sphere is I=25mr2I = \frac{2}{5}mr^2.

To solve this problem:

  1. Identify the given values:
  • Mass (m) = 1.0 kg
  • Radius (r) = 0.20 m
  • Height (h) = 0.50 m
  • Moment of inertia formula: I=25mr2I = \frac{2}{5}mr^2
  1. Apply conservation of energy: Gravitational potential energy at the top equals total kinetic energy at the bottom. mgh=Ktotal=Ktrans+Krotmgh = K_{total} = K_{trans} + K_{rot}

  2. For a solid sphere rolling without slipping, the relationship between translational and rotational kinetic energy is: Krot=Iω22=I2×v2r2=I2r2×v2K_{rot} = \frac{I\omega^2}{2} = \frac{I}{2} \times \frac{v^2}{r^2} = \frac{I}{2r^2} \times v^2

  3. Substitute the moment of inertia: Krot=25mr22r2×v2=15mv2K_{rot} = \frac{\frac{2}{5}mr^2}{2r^2} \times v^2 = \frac{1}{5}mv^2

  4. Therefore: Ktotal=Ktrans+Krot=12mv2+15mv2=710mv2K_{total} = K_{trans} + K_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{5}mv^2 = \frac{7}{10}mv^2

  5. From conservation of energy: mgh=710mv2mgh = \frac{7}{10}mv^2

  6. Solve for v: v2=10gh7=10×9.8×0.507=7.0v^2 = \frac{10gh}{7} = \frac{10 \times 9.8 \times 0.50}{7} = 7.0 v=2.65 m/sv = 2.65 \text{ m/s}

  7. Calculate the total kinetic energy: Ktotal=710mv2=710×1.0×7.0=4.9 JK_{total} = \frac{7}{10}mv^2 = \frac{7}{10} \times 1.0 \times 7.0 = 4.9 \text{ J}

The total kinetic energy of the sphere at the bottom of the ramp is 4.9 joules.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is rotational kinetic energy and how is it different from regular kinetic energy?

Rotational kinetic energy is the energy a rigid object has because it’s spinning. For a rigid body rotating about a fixed axis it’s given by K_rot = 1/2 I ω^2, where I is the moment (rotational) inertia and ω is angular speed (CED 6.1.A.1). Unlike “regular” (translational) kinetic energy, K_trans = 1/2 M v_CM^2 depends on the center-of-mass speed; K_rot depends on how the mass is distributed about the axis (I) and each point’s linear speed v = ωr. The total kinetic energy of a rolling or moving rigid body is the sum: K_total = 1/2 M v_CM^2 + 1/2 I_CM ω^2 (CED 6.1.A.1.ii). A rigid body can have rotational KE even when its center of mass is at rest because internal points still move (CED 6.1.A.2). Rotational KE is a scalar (CED 6.1.A.3). For a quick AP-aligned review, see the Topic 6.1 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ) and extra practice (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised).

How do you calculate rotational kinetic energy using the formula?

Use the formula K_rot = 1/2 I ω^2. Here I is the rotational inertia (moment of inertia) about the rotation axis and ω is the angular speed in rad/s. For a system of point masses, I = Σ m_i r_i^2 (or for a continuous body compute the appropriate integral or use standard formulas: e.g., solid disk I = 1/2 MR^2, thin hoop I = MR^2). If the axis is parallel but not through the center of mass, use the parallel-axis theorem: I = I_cm + M d^2. Remember rotational kinetic energy is a scalar and the total kinetic energy of a rigid body can be written K_total = K_trans + K_rot = 1/2 M v_cm^2 + 1/2 I_cm ω^2. This is exactly what the AP CED expects for Topic 6.1 (see the study guide for worked examples: https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ). For extra practice, try problems at https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised.

Why does a spinning object have kinetic energy even when it's not moving anywhere?

Even if an object’s center of mass isn’t changing position, its parts can be moving. Each tiny mass element at distance r from the axis has linear speed v = ωr, so it has kinetic energy ½ dm · v². Summing those ½ dm·(ωr)² over the whole rigid body gives Krot = ½ I ω², where I (rotational inertia) encodes how the mass is distributed. So the object “has” kinetic energy because its internal pieces are moving—even though the center of mass is at rest (CED 6.1.A.1–2). Rotational KE is a scalar and adds to any translational KE: Ktotal = ½MvCM² + ½Iω² (CED 6.1.A.1.ii). This idea shows up on the exam when you compare rotational and translational energy (Unit 6), so be ready to derive Krot from point-mass sums or use ½Iω² directly. For a concise review, check the Topic 6.1 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ) and try practice problems (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised).

What's the difference between rotational inertia and angular velocity in the rotational kinetic energy equation?

Rotational inertia (I) and angular velocity (ω) play very different roles in Krot = ½ I ω². - Rotational inertia (I, sometimes called moment of inertia) is a geometry-and-mass property of the object. It tells you how the object’s mass is distributed relative to the rotation axis. A big I means the object “resists” changes in rotation more (e.g., a hoop has larger I than a solid disk of the same mass and radius). I depends on shape, axis, and mass (use standard formulas or the parallel-axis theorem). - Angular velocity (ω) is how fast the object is spinning (radians per second). It’s a kinematic quantity—higher ω means every mass element moves faster. In the energy formula, I scales how much kinetic energy you get for a given ω. For the same ω, an object with larger I stores more rotational KE; for the same I, increasing ω raises KE as ω². This matches CED 6.1.A (Krot = ½ I ω²). For review and examples, see the Topic 6.1 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ) and practice problems (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised).

I'm confused about how an object can have both rotational and translational kinetic energy at the same time - can someone explain?

Short answer: an object can have both because parts of it move as a whole (translation of the center of mass) and also move about the center (rotation). The total kinetic energy of a rigid body is the sum of translational plus rotational parts: K_total = K_trans + K_rot = (1/2) M v_cm^2 + (1/2) I_cm ω^2. Why that makes sense: imagine a rolling wheel. Every small piece of the wheel has linear speed from the wheel’s center moving and extra speed from spinning around that center. Summing the kinetic energy of all those pieces gives the two-term expression above. If the center of mass is at rest (v_cm = 0) you can still have K_rot > 0 because the parts move around the center (a spinning disk). For a rolling object without slipping use v_cm = ωR to relate the two energies and find how energy splits between translation and rotation (useful on AP problems). For AP Topic 6.1, memorize K_rot = 1/2 I ω^2 and that total KE = translational + rotational. More examples and practice problems are in the Topic 6.1 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ) and in the unit practice set (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised).

How do you find the total kinetic energy of something that's both spinning and moving forward?

If an object both translates (moves its center of mass) and rotates, the total kinetic energy is the sum of the translational KE of the center of mass and the rotational KE about the center of mass (CED 6.1.A.1.ii): K_total = (1/2) M v_cm^2 + (1/2) I_cm ω^2 - M is the object's total mass, v_cm is the center-of-mass speed, I_cm is the moment of inertia about the center-of-mass axis, and ω is the angular speed. Rotational KE is a scalar (CED 6.1.A.3). - For pure rolling without slipping, use v_cm = ωR to relate the two terms; for example a solid disk gives K_total = (1/2) M v_cm^2 + (1/4) M v_cm^2 = (3/4) M v_cm^2. - If rotation is about an axis not through the CM, use the parallel-axis theorem to get I about the rotation axis before using (1/2)Iω^2. This is exactly what AP expects—write both terms and add them (see Topic 6.1 study guide: https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ). For extra practice, try problems in the Unit 6 practice set (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised).

What does it mean that rotational kinetic energy is a scalar quantity?

Saying rotational kinetic energy is a scalar means it has magnitude only—no direction. For a rigid body rotating about an axis its rotational kinetic energy is Krot = 1/2 I ω^2 (CED 6.1.A.1). Because ω is squared, Krot is always nonnegative and doesn’t change if the rotation reverses direction (ω → −ω). That contrasts with angular momentum (a vector) which does have direction. Practically for AP problems, treat Krot like any other scalar energy: you can add it to translational kinetic energy to get the total kinetic energy of a rigid system (CED 6.1.A.1.ii), and use it in energy-conservation statements without worrying about vector components (CED 6.1.A.3). For more review on this topic and examples, see the Topic 6.1 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ). For extra practice, check the unit practice set (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised).

Why is the rotational kinetic energy formula so similar to the regular kinetic energy formula?

They look alike because they come from the same idea: kinetic energy = 1/2 × (inertia) × (speed)^2. For a rigid body you can treat it as lots of point masses. Each point mass i has linear speed v_i = ω r_i when the body rotates about an axis, so its KE is 1/2 m_i v_i^2 = 1/2 m_i (ω^2 r_i^2). Factor ω^2 out and sum over all points: K_rot = 1/2 ω^2 Σ m_i r_i^2. That sum is the rotational inertia I, so K_rot = 1/2 I ω^2. That’s why the form mirrors 1/2 m v^2. Also remember the CED point that a rigid body’s total kinetic energy = translational (1/2 M v_cm^2) + rotational about the CM (1/2 I_cm ω^2). If you want more worked examples and AP-style practice on this, check the Topic 6.1 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ) and the practice problems collection (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised).

Can a wheel spinning in place have the same kinetic energy as a car driving down the road?

Yes—numerically they can have the same kinetic energy, but you must be careful what “same” means. Rotational KE for a rigid body is Krot = 1/2 I ω^2 (CED 6.1.A.1). A wheel spinning in place (center of mass at rest) can have nonzero Krot because points in the wheel still move (CED 6.1.A.2). A car driving has translational KE of the whole car Ktrans = 1/2 M v_cm^2 plus rotational KE of its wheels; total K = Ktrans + ΣKrot (CED 6.1.A.1.ii). So it’s possible for a single spinning wheel to have the same numeric KE as a moving car if 1/2 I ω^2 equals the car’s total KE. For a thin hoop I = MR^2, Krot = 1/2 M(ωR)^2 = 1/2 M v^2, so a hoop spinning with ω that gives v = ωR has the same KE as a mass M translating at speed v. For rolling without slipping, relate ω and v by v = ωR (CED keywords: rotational-translational equivalence, moment of inertia). Want practice comparing scenarios like this? See the Topic 6.1 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ) and try problems at Fiveable practice (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised).

How do you know when to use rotational kinetic energy vs translational kinetic energy in problems?

Use rotational KE whenever parts of the object are moving in a circle about an axis—then K_rot = 1/2 I ω^2 applies (I about that axis, ω the angular speed). Use translational KE (K_trans = 1/2 Mv_cm^2) for motion of the object’s center of mass. For rigid bodies the total kinetic energy is the sum: K_total = 1/2 M v_cm^2 + 1/2 I_cm ω^2 (so you often need both, e.g., a rolling wheel: it has translational KE from v_cm and rotational KE about its center). If the CM is at rest but parts still move (a spinning disk fixed at its center), only K_rot appears. On AP tasks you should state which axis and which I you use and add energies (CED 6.1.A). Want more worked examples and practice? See the Topic 6.1 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ) and plenty of practice problems (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised).

What's rotational inertia and how is it different from regular inertia?

Rotational inertia (moment of inertia, I) is a measure of how hard it is to change an object’s rotational motion about a given axis. It plays the same role for rotation that mass plays for linear motion. In equations: rotational kinetic energy K_rot = 1/2 I ω^2 (CED 6.1.A.1). Key differences from “regular” inertia (mass): - Mass is a scalar that resists changes in linear velocity; I depends on both mass and how that mass is distributed relative to the rotation axis (point masses at larger radii contribute more: I = Σ m r^2 for point masses). - I depends on the chosen axis (use the parallel-axis theorem to shift axes). - Both are measures of resistance to acceleration, but mass resists linear acceleration (F = ma) while I resists angular acceleration (τ = I α). - Rotational inertia is used in calculating rotational kinetic energy and total kinetic energy (translational + rotational) of rigid bodies (CED 6.1.A.1.ii, 6.1.A.2). For a quick AP-aligned review, see the Topic 6.1 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ). For lots of practice problems, check Fiveable practice (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised).

I don't understand how individual points in a spinning object can have linear speed - what does that mean?

When an object spins, every bit of its mass moves in a circle about the rotation axis—that motion is linear (tangent) motion even though the object as a whole is "rotating." For a rigid body turning with angular speed ω, a point at distance r from the axis has linear speed v = ωr (units: m/s). That means each little mass element mi has kinetic energy 1/2 mi v^2 = 1/2 mi (ωr)^2. Adding those energies for all the bits gives Krot = 1/2 I ω^2, where I = Σ mi r^2 is the rotational inertia (CED 6.1.A.1.i & 6.1.A.2). So even if the center of mass is at rest, the points around it have nonzero v and thus the object has rotational kinetic energy. For a concrete example: if ω = 2 rad/s and r = 0.5 m, v = 1.0 m/s and that point’s KE per kg is 0.5*(1.0)^2 = 0.5 J/kg. Review this derivation and examples in the Topic 6.1 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ). For more practice problems, check Fiveable’s AP Physics 1 practice set (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised).

How do you compare the rotational kinetic energy of different spinning objects?

Use Krot = 1/2 I ω^2. To compare two spinning objects, plug in each object’s moment of inertia I (depends on mass and how it’s distributed about the axis) and their angular speeds ω. Key points: - If two objects have the same ω, the one with larger I has more rotational kinetic energy. Example: a thin hoop (I = MR^2) at the same ω has twice the Krot of a solid disk (I = 1/2 MR^2) with the same mass and radius. - If two objects have the same I, the one with larger ω has more Krot (K ∝ ω^2), so doubling ω quadruples Krot. - For moving/rolling rigid bodies, total kinetic energy = translational Kcm + rotational Krot about the center of mass (CED 6.1.A.2). Rotational KE is a scalar (CED 6.1.A.3). - Use the parallel-axis theorem if the rotation axis isn’t through the center of mass to get the correct I before comparing. For more examples and quick reference (moments of inertia and comparisons), check the Topic 6.1 study guide on Fiveable (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ) and practice problems (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised). On the exam, be ready to justify comparisons by citing I and ω and possibly using parallel-axis or total-energy statements.

Why do we need both I and omega squared in the rotational kinetic energy equation?

Think of rotational kinetic energy as the sum of the translational kinetic energies of every little piece of a rigid body. Each small mass dm at radius r moves with speed v = ωr, so its KE is (1/2) dm · v² = (1/2) dm · (ω² r²). Integrate over the whole object: K = (1/2) ω² ∫ r² dm. That integral ∫ r² dm is the rotational inertia I about the rotation axis, so K = (1/2) I ω². So you need both factors because they answer two different questions: - I (the moment of inertia) encodes how much mass is involved and how it’s distributed relative to the axis—masses far from the axis contribute much more. - ω² gives the square of the angular speed, turning that geometry into actual linear speeds (v = ωr) and therefore kinetic energy. This matches the CED essential knowledge (6.1.A.1 and 6.1.A.1.i): rotational KE is equivalent to the sum of translational KEs and depends on rotational inertia and angular velocity. For more practice and the topic study guide, see Fiveable’s Topic 6.1 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ) and unit overview (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6).

What happens to rotational kinetic energy when you change the axis of rotation?

Rotational kinetic energy depends on the axis because Krot = 1/2 I ω^2 and the moment of inertia I changes with the axis. Use the parallel-axis theorem: Iaxis = Icm + M d^2 (d = distance from center-of-mass axis). So if the body has the same angular speed ω about a new axis a distance d from the CM, Krot(axis) = 1/2 (Icm + M d^2) ω^2 = 1/2 Icm ω^2 + 1/2 M (d ω)^2. Interpretation: Krot about the CM (1/2 Icm ω^2) is the “pure” rotation part; the extra 1/2 M(d ω)^2 is just the translational kinetic energy of the center of mass when it moves with speed vcm = d ω. So changing the axis (increasing d) increases Krot because I grows—rotational KE is a scalar and changes with the chosen rotation axis unless you account separately for CM translation. This idea shows up on the AP exam (CED 6.1.A and the parallel-axis theorem); review Topic 6.1 on Fiveable (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-physics-1-revised/unit-6/1-rotational-kinetic-energy/study-guide/OM0z7GYjhkcWoIlZ) and practice more at (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-physics-1-revised).