Intro to Political Science

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Korematsu v. United States

from class:

Intro to Political Science

Definition

Korematsu v. United States was a landmark Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the forced relocation and incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II. The decision established the legal precedent that the government could violate individual civil liberties in the name of national security.

congrats on reading the definition of Korematsu v. United States. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. The Korematsu decision upheld the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066, which authorized the forced relocation and incarceration of Japanese Americans during WWII.
  2. The Court ruled that the government's action was justified by 'military necessity' and the need to prevent espionage and sabotage, despite a lack of evidence of disloyalty among Japanese Americans.
  3. Korematsu v. United States has been widely criticized as one of the Supreme Court's most egregious failures to protect civil liberties, setting a dangerous precedent for the suspension of constitutional rights.
  4. In 1983, Korematsu's conviction was overturned in federal court, and in 1988, the U.S. government issued a formal apology and reparations to Japanese American internment camp survivors.
  5. The Korematsu decision has been cited in subsequent cases involving national security and the curtailment of civil liberties, highlighting its lasting impact on American jurisprudence.

Review Questions

  • Explain the key facts and legal reasoning behind the Supreme Court's decision in Korematsu v. United States.
    • In Korematsu v. United States, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066, which authorized the forced relocation and incarceration of over 120,000 Japanese Americans during World War II. The Court ruled that the government's actions were justified by 'military necessity' and the need to prevent espionage and sabotage, despite a lack of evidence of disloyalty among Japanese Americans. The decision established a legal precedent that the government could violate individual civil liberties in the name of national security, a ruling that has been widely criticized as one of the Court's most egregious failures to protect constitutional rights.
  • Analyze the long-term impact of the Korematsu decision on American jurisprudence and civil liberties.
    • The Korematsu v. United States decision has had a lasting impact on American jurisprudence, setting a dangerous precedent for the suspension of constitutional rights in the name of national security. The ruling has been cited in subsequent cases involving the curtailment of civil liberties, such as the internment of Muslim Americans after 9/11. While Korematsu's conviction was eventually overturned in 1983, and the U.S. government issued a formal apology and reparations to Japanese American internment camp survivors in 1988, the decision continues to be a stain on the Supreme Court's legacy and a cautionary tale about the dangers of prioritizing national security over individual rights.
  • Evaluate the moral and ethical implications of the Korematsu decision and its role in the broader history of civil rights abuses in the United States.
    • The Korematsu v. United States decision represents a profound moral and ethical failure of the American legal system. By upholding the forced relocation and incarceration of Japanese Americans solely on the basis of their ethnicity, the Supreme Court sanctioned the violation of fundamental civil liberties and the unjust treatment of a vulnerable minority group. This decision not only perpetuated a shameful chapter of racial discrimination in U.S. history, but also set a precedent that has been used to justify the curtailment of rights for other marginalized communities in the name of national security. The Korematsu case highlights the need for the judiciary to serve as a bulwark against the tyranny of the majority and to steadfastly protect the constitutional rights of all citizens, even in times of crisis. The legacy of this decision serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of sacrificing individual freedoms for the perceived security of the state.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides