Deaccessioning

Definition

Deaccessioning refers to the process of removing items from a museum or collection, typically for reasons such as redundancy, condition, or relevance to the institution's mission. This practice is essential for maintaining the integrity and focus of a collection, allowing curators to ensure that exhibitions reflect the evolving narrative and standards of the institution. Deaccessioning can also involve ethical considerations regarding ownership, provenance, and the future of the artifacts.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Deaccessioning is often guided by a collection management policy that outlines the criteria and procedures for removing items.
2. The decision to deaccession can involve consultation with stakeholders, including curators, conservators, and community members.
3. Funds generated from deaccessioning may only be used for the acquisition of new items or conservation efforts, as per professional standards.
4. Deaccessioning can spark controversy, especially if it involves historically significant or culturally sensitive items.
5. Proper documentation during deaccessioning is crucial to maintain transparency and accountability in collections management.

Review Questions

• What are some common reasons museums might choose to deaccession items from their collections?
  • Museums may decide to deaccession items for various reasons including redundancy within the collection, poor condition that renders an item unusable, or a lack of relevance to the institution's mission. Additionally, if an item does not meet current standards for exhibition or research, it may be considered for removal. This process ensures that the collection remains focused and meaningful, reflecting the institution’s evolving narrative.
• Discuss the ethical considerations involved in the deaccessioning process and how they impact decision-making.
  • Ethical considerations play a significant role in deaccessioning decisions. Institutions must navigate issues such as provenance, ensuring that items are legally owned and have clear histories. Curatorial ethics also dictate that museums must consider the cultural significance of items, especially those tied to specific communities or histories. The impact of these considerations often leads institutions to seek input from stakeholders and uphold transparency throughout the deaccessioning process.
• Analyze how deaccessioning affects the relationship between a museum and its community or audience.
  • Deaccessioning can significantly affect a museum's relationship with its community by influencing perceptions of trust and credibility. When museums remove items, especially those with cultural significance or historical importance, it can lead to public outcry and a sense of loss among community members. Conversely, if handled transparently and ethically, deaccessioning can enhance a museum's reputation by demonstrating commitment to maintaining a relevant and high-quality collection. Ultimately, effective communication about the reasons and processes behind deaccessioning is essential for fostering understanding and support from audiences.

Related terms

Accessioning: The process of formally adding an item to a collection, establishing its legal and institutional status within a museum.

Provenance: The history of ownership and transfer of an artifact, which is crucial for establishing authenticity and value.

Curatorial Ethics: The moral principles guiding museum professionals in their decisions about acquisitions, deaccessions, and collections management.