🤕Torts Unit 12 – Defamation and Privacy Torts

Key Concepts and Definitions

• Defamation involves a false statement that harms a person's reputation or standing in the community
• Libel refers to written or published defamatory statements while slander refers to spoken defamatory statements
• Defamation per se includes statements that are so inherently harmful that damages are presumed without further proof (accusing someone of a crime, having a loathsome disease, being unchaste, or disparaging their business or trade)
• Defamation per quod requires the plaintiff to prove special damages resulting from the defamatory statement
• Actual malice is the standard for public figures, requiring knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth
• Negligence is the standard for private figures, requiring a lack of reasonable care in publishing the statement
• Opinion is generally protected speech, but can be defamatory if it implies false facts

Historical Context and Legal Evolution

• Defamation law has roots in English common law, originally focused on protecting the nobility from criticism
• In the United States, defamation law has evolved to balance free speech rights with protecting individual reputations
• The landmark case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) established the actual malice standard for public figures
• Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974) distinguished between public and private figures, allowing states to set their own standards for private figures
  • Most states have adopted a negligence standard for private figures
• The rise of the internet has presented new challenges for defamation law, such as online anonymity and the rapid spread of information
• Some states have enacted anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) laws to protect free speech and prevent frivolous defamation lawsuits

Types of Defamation

• Libel involves written or published defamatory statements, including online posts, articles, and social media
• Slander involves spoken defamatory statements, such as in conversations, speeches, or interviews
• Defamation per se includes statements that are inherently harmful without further proof
  • Accusing someone of a crime
  • Claiming someone has a loathsome disease (leprosy, sexually transmitted diseases)
  • Attacking a woman's chastity or a man's sexual orientation
  • Disparaging someone's business, trade, or profession
• Defamation per quod requires the plaintiff to prove special damages resulting from the statement
• Group defamation involves defamatory statements about a group or class of people, but is generally more difficult to prove
• Defamation by implication occurs when a statement, while not explicitly false, creates a defamatory impression through context or omission

Elements of a Defamation Claim

• The statement must be false; truth is an absolute defense to defamation
• The statement must be published or communicated to a third party
  • This includes oral, written, and online communication
• The statement must be "of and concerning" the plaintiff, identifying them specifically or by implication
• The statement must be defamatory, harming the plaintiff's reputation or standing in the community
• The defendant must have acted with the requisite degree of fault
  • Actual malice for public figures (knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth)
  • Negligence for private figures (lack of reasonable care in publishing the statement)
• The plaintiff must prove damages, either presumed (defamation per se) or special damages (defamation per quod)

Defenses to Defamation

• Truth is an absolute defense; if the statement is substantially true, there is no defamation
• Opinion is protected speech, but can be defamatory if it implies false facts
• Fair comment and criticism involve honest opinions on matters of public interest, such as reviews or political commentary
• Privilege protects certain statements made in specific contexts
  • Absolute privilege covers statements made in legislative, judicial, or administrative proceedings
  • Qualified privilege covers statements made in the public interest or with a legal, moral, or social duty to communicate
• Retraction or correction can mitigate damages if the defendant promptly acknowledges and corrects the defamatory statement
• Consent is a defense if the plaintiff agreed to the publication of the defamatory statement
• Statute of limitations bars defamation claims after a certain period, typically one to three years from publication

Privacy Torts Overview

• Privacy torts protect an individual's right to privacy and freedom from intrusion
• Intrusion upon seclusion involves physically or electronically intruding into someone's private space or affairs
• Public disclosure of private facts involves revealing truthful but private information that is not of legitimate public concern
• False light involves publishing information that creates a false and highly offensive impression of the plaintiff
• Appropriation of name or likeness involves using someone's identity for commercial gain without their consent
• Privacy torts often involve balancing individual privacy rights with free speech and press freedoms
• Some states have codified privacy torts in statutes, while others rely on common law

Damages and Remedies

• Compensatory damages aim to compensate the plaintiff for actual losses caused by the defamation
  • Special damages include specific economic losses, such as lost business or employment opportunities
  • General damages include non-economic harm, such as emotional distress or humiliation
• Presumed damages are available in cases of defamation per se, without proof of actual harm
• Punitive damages may be awarded to punish and deter malicious or reckless conduct
• Injunctive relief involves a court order prohibiting further publication of the defamatory statement
• Retraction or correction can mitigate damages by acknowledging and correcting the defamatory statement
• Attorney's fees may be awarded to the prevailing party in some cases, particularly under anti-SLAPP statutes

Recent Cases and Legal Trends

• The internet has presented new challenges for defamation law, such as online anonymity and the rapid spread of information
  • In Doe v. Cahill (2005), the Delaware Supreme Court set a high standard for unmasking anonymous online commenters in defamation cases
• Social media has become a frequent source of defamation claims, with users held liable for posts, comments, and shares
  • In Jacobus v. Trump (2017), a New York court held that then-President Donald Trump's tweets were non-actionable opinion
• Anti-SLAPP laws have been enacted in many states to protect free speech and prevent frivolous defamation lawsuits
  • In Prather v. Neva Specialties, Inc. (2020), a Texas court applied the state's anti-SLAPP law to dismiss a defamation claim arising from an online review
• The #MeToo movement has led to an increase in defamation claims related to sexual misconduct allegations
  • In Hughes v. Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. (2017), a former Fox News contributor sued the network for defamation after being accused of sexual harassment
• Some jurisdictions have begun to recognize the "neutral reportage" defense, protecting the republication of newsworthy allegations made by prominent sources
  • In Edwards v. National Audubon Society, Inc. (1977), the Second Circuit recognized the neutral reportage defense in a case involving accusations of scientific fraud