Model Theory

🧠Model Theory Unit 1 – Model Theory: First-Order Logic Intro

First-order logic is a formal system for representing and reasoning about mathematical structures. It uses a precise language with symbols for constants, functions, and relations, allowing for unambiguous statements about elements and their relationships in a domain. The syntax of first-order logic includes variables, terms, and formulas built using logical connectives and quantifiers. Semantics provide meaning through interpretations, which assign elements, functions, and relations to symbols. This framework enables rigorous mathematical reasoning and has applications in various fields.

Key Concepts and Definitions

  • First-order logic (FOL) is a formal system used to represent and reason about mathematical structures and their properties
  • FOL consists of a formal language with well-defined syntax and semantics, allowing for precise and unambiguous statements
  • Signature of a first-order language includes constant symbols, function symbols, and relation symbols
    • Constant symbols represent specific elements in the domain of discourse
    • Function symbols represent mappings between elements in the domain
    • Relation symbols represent relationships between elements in the domain
  • Terms are expressions built from variables, constants, and function symbols, representing elements in the domain
  • Formulas are expressions built from terms, relation symbols, and logical connectives, representing statements about the elements and their relationships
  • Structures (models) are mathematical objects that provide an interpretation for the symbols in a first-order language, giving meaning to the formulas
  • Validity of a formula means it is true in all possible structures (models) that interpret the language
  • Satisfiability of a formula means there exists at least one structure (model) in which the formula is true

Syntax of First-Order Logic

  • Alphabet of a first-order language includes variables, constant symbols, function symbols, relation symbols, and logical connectives
  • Variables (usually denoted by lowercase letters like xx, yy, zz) represent arbitrary elements in the domain of discourse
  • Terms are recursively defined as variables, constants, or function symbols applied to terms
    • Example: If ff is a unary function symbol and cc is a constant symbol, then f(c)f(c) and f(f(x))f(f(x)) are terms
  • Atomic formulas are formed by applying relation symbols to terms
    • Example: If RR is a binary relation symbol, xx is a variable, and cc is a constant symbol, then R(x,c)R(x, c) is an atomic formula
  • Complex formulas are built from atomic formulas using logical connectives and quantifiers
    • Logical connectives include negation (¬\neg), conjunction (\wedge), disjunction (\vee), implication (\rightarrow), and equivalence (\leftrightarrow)
    • Quantifiers include universal quantifier (\forall) and existential quantifier (\exists)
  • Well-formed formulas (wffs) are formulas constructed according to the syntax rules of the first-order language
  • Free variables are variables not bound by any quantifier, while bound variables are variables within the scope of a quantifier

Semantics and Interpretations

  • Semantics of FOL specify how to interpret the symbols in a first-order language within a given structure (model)
  • Interpretation (model) M\mathcal{M} consists of a non-empty domain DD and an assignment of meanings to the symbols in the language
    • Constant symbols are assigned specific elements from the domain DD
    • Function symbols are assigned functions on the domain DD
    • Relation symbols are assigned relations on the domain DD
  • Variable assignment ss is a function that maps variables to elements in the domain DD
  • Term interpretation tM[s]t^\mathcal{M}[s] is the element in DD obtained by evaluating the term tt under the interpretation M\mathcal{M} and variable assignment ss
  • Formula satisfaction Mφ[s]\mathcal{M} \models \varphi[s] means the formula φ\varphi is true in the interpretation M\mathcal{M} under the variable assignment ss
    • Atomic formulas are true if the relation holds for the interpreted terms
    • Complex formulas are evaluated based on the truth values of their subformulas and the semantics of the logical connectives and quantifiers
  • Validity φ\models \varphi means the formula φ\varphi is true in all interpretations (models) for all variable assignments
  • Satisfiability means there exists an interpretation (model) and a variable assignment under which the formula is true

Logical Connectives and Quantifiers

  • Logical connectives combine formulas to create more complex formulas
  • Negation (¬φ\neg \varphi) is true if and only if φ\varphi is false
  • Conjunction (φψ\varphi \wedge \psi) is true if and only if both φ\varphi and ψ\psi are true
  • Disjunction (φψ\varphi \vee \psi) is true if and only if at least one of φ\varphi or ψ\psi is true
  • Implication (φψ\varphi \rightarrow \psi) is true if and only if φ\varphi is false or ψ\psi is true
  • Equivalence (φψ\varphi \leftrightarrow \psi) is true if and only if φ\varphi and ψ\psi have the same truth value
  • Quantifiers express properties of elements in the domain of discourse
  • Universal quantifier (xφ(x)\forall x \varphi(x)) is true if and only if φ(x)\varphi(x) is true for all elements in the domain
    • Example: x(x>0)\forall x (x > 0) states that all elements in the domain are greater than zero
  • Existential quantifier (xφ(x)\exists x \varphi(x)) is true if and only if there exists at least one element in the domain for which φ(x)\varphi(x) is true
    • Example: x(x2=2)\exists x (x^2 = 2) states that there exists an element in the domain whose square is equal to two
  • Quantifier scope extends to the formula immediately following the quantifier, unless parentheses are used to specify a different scope
  • Nested quantifiers allow for expressing more complex properties involving multiple elements in the domain

Formal Proofs and Inference Rules

  • Formal proofs are sequences of formulas, each of which is either an axiom or derived from previous formulas using inference rules
  • Axioms are formulas assumed to be true without proof, serving as the starting points for formal proofs
  • Inference rules specify how to derive new formulas from existing ones, preserving truth
  • Modus Ponens (MP) is an inference rule that allows deriving ψ\psi from φ\varphi and φψ\varphi \rightarrow \psi
  • Universal Instantiation (UI) allows deriving φ(t)\varphi(t) from xφ(x)\forall x \varphi(x), where tt is a term substituted for the variable xx
  • Existential Generalization (EG) allows deriving xφ(x)\exists x \varphi(x) from φ(t)\varphi(t), where tt is a term substituted for the variable xx
  • Other inference rules include Modus Tollens, Hypothetical Syllogism, and Resolution
  • Soundness of an inference rule means that if the premises are true, the conclusion derived using the rule is also true
  • Completeness of a proof system means that all valid formulas can be derived using the axioms and inference rules of the system

Models and Structures

  • Models (structures) are mathematical objects that provide an interpretation for the symbols in a first-order language
  • A model M\mathcal{M} consists of a non-empty domain DD and an interpretation function II that assigns meanings to the symbols in the language
  • Isomorphic models have the same structure, differing only in the naming of elements in the domain
  • Elementary equivalence means that two models satisfy the same first-order formulas
  • Finite models have a finite domain, while infinite models have an infinite domain
  • Decidability of a theory means there exists an algorithm to determine whether a given formula is true in all models of the theory
  • Completeness of a theory means that for every formula, either the formula or its negation is provable from the axioms of the theory
  • Categoricity of a theory means that all models of the theory are isomorphic
  • Compactness theorem states that if every finite subset of a set of formulas has a model, then the entire set of formulas has a model

Applications and Examples

  • First-order logic is widely used in mathematics, computer science, and philosophy to formalize and reason about various concepts
  • Peano arithmetic is a first-order theory that axiomatizes the natural numbers and their properties
    • Example: x(x+0=x)\forall x (x + 0 = x) is an axiom stating that adding zero to any number results in the same number
  • Set theory (ZFC) is a first-order theory that axiomatizes the principles of sets and their operations
    • Example: xy(z(zxzy)x=y)\forall x \forall y (\forall z (z \in x \leftrightarrow z \in y) \rightarrow x = y) is the axiom of extensionality, stating that sets with the same elements are equal
  • Group theory is a first-order theory that axiomatizes the properties of algebraic structures called groups
    • Example: xyz((xy)z=x(yz))\forall x \forall y \forall z ((x * y) * z = x * (y * z)) is the axiom of associativity, stating that the order of applying the group operation does not matter
  • First-order logic is used in database query languages (SQL) to express constraints and retrieve information from relational databases
  • Automated theorem provers use first-order logic to prove mathematical theorems and verify the correctness of software and hardware systems

Common Challenges and Tips

  • Translating natural language statements into first-order logic formulas can be challenging due to ambiguity and implicit assumptions
    • Tip: Break down complex statements into simpler components and identify the key elements (objects, properties, and relationships)
  • Choosing the appropriate signature (constant, function, and relation symbols) is crucial for accurately representing the problem domain
    • Tip: Consider the essential elements and their relationships, and select symbols that capture these aspects concisely
  • Quantifier ordering and scope can significantly impact the meaning of formulas
    • Tip: Pay attention to the order of quantifiers and use parentheses to clarify the scope when necessary
  • Proving validity or unsatisfiability of formulas can be difficult, especially for complex formulas with multiple quantifiers
    • Tip: Break down the proof into smaller steps, use inference rules strategically, and consider proof by contradiction or contrapositive
  • Constructing models to show the satisfiability of formulas requires creativity and understanding of the problem domain
    • Tip: Start with simple models and gradually add complexity, ensuring that the model satisfies the given formulas
  • Identifying the limitations of first-order logic, such as its inability to express certain concepts like finiteness or transitive closure
    • Tip: Be aware of the expressive power of first-order logic and consider alternative logics or extensions when necessary
  • Recognizing the decidability and complexity of first-order theories is important for understanding the feasibility of automated reasoning tasks
    • Tip: Familiarize yourself with known decidable and undecidable theories, and consider the computational complexity of decision procedures
  • Applying first-order logic to real-world problems requires careful modeling and interpretation of results
    • Tip: Collaborate with domain experts to ensure accurate representation and validate the conclusions drawn from logical reasoning


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.