🧠Model Theory Unit 1 – Model Theory: First-Order Logic Intro
First-order logic is a formal system for representing and reasoning about mathematical structures. It uses a precise language with symbols for constants, functions, and relations, allowing for unambiguous statements about elements and their relationships in a domain.
The syntax of first-order logic includes variables, terms, and formulas built using logical connectives and quantifiers. Semantics provide meaning through interpretations, which assign elements, functions, and relations to symbols. This framework enables rigorous mathematical reasoning and has applications in various fields.
First-order logic (FOL) is a formal system used to represent and reason about mathematical structures and their properties
FOL consists of a formal language with well-defined syntax and semantics, allowing for precise and unambiguous statements
Signature of a first-order language includes constant symbols, function symbols, and relation symbols
Constant symbols represent specific elements in the domain of discourse
Function symbols represent mappings between elements in the domain
Relation symbols represent relationships between elements in the domain
Terms are expressions built from variables, constants, and function symbols, representing elements in the domain
Formulas are expressions built from terms, relation symbols, and logical connectives, representing statements about the elements and their relationships
Structures (models) are mathematical objects that provide an interpretation for the symbols in a first-order language, giving meaning to the formulas
Validity of a formula means it is true in all possible structures (models) that interpret the language
Satisfiability of a formula means there exists at least one structure (model) in which the formula is true
Syntax of First-Order Logic
Alphabet of a first-order language includes variables, constant symbols, function symbols, relation symbols, and logical connectives
Variables (usually denoted by lowercase letters like x, y, z) represent arbitrary elements in the domain of discourse
Terms are recursively defined as variables, constants, or function symbols applied to terms
Example: If f is a unary function symbol and c is a constant symbol, then f(c) and f(f(x)) are terms
Atomic formulas are formed by applying relation symbols to terms
Example: If R is a binary relation symbol, x is a variable, and c is a constant symbol, then R(x,c) is an atomic formula
Complex formulas are built from atomic formulas using logical connectives and quantifiers
Logical connectives include negation (¬), conjunction (∧), disjunction (∨), implication (→), and equivalence (↔)
Quantifiers include universal quantifier (∀) and existential quantifier (∃)
Well-formed formulas (wffs) are formulas constructed according to the syntax rules of the first-order language
Free variables are variables not bound by any quantifier, while bound variables are variables within the scope of a quantifier
Semantics and Interpretations
Semantics of FOL specify how to interpret the symbols in a first-order language within a given structure (model)
Interpretation (model) M consists of a non-empty domain D and an assignment of meanings to the symbols in the language
Constant symbols are assigned specific elements from the domain D
Function symbols are assigned functions on the domain D
Relation symbols are assigned relations on the domain D
Variable assignment s is a function that maps variables to elements in the domain D
Term interpretation tM[s] is the element in D obtained by evaluating the term t under the interpretation M and variable assignment s
Formula satisfaction M⊨φ[s] means the formula φ is true in the interpretation M under the variable assignment s
Atomic formulas are true if the relation holds for the interpreted terms
Complex formulas are evaluated based on the truth values of their subformulas and the semantics of the logical connectives and quantifiers
Validity ⊨φ means the formula φ is true in all interpretations (models) for all variable assignments
Satisfiability means there exists an interpretation (model) and a variable assignment under which the formula is true
Logical Connectives and Quantifiers
Logical connectives combine formulas to create more complex formulas
Negation (¬φ) is true if and only if φ is false
Conjunction (φ∧ψ) is true if and only if both φ and ψ are true
Disjunction (φ∨ψ) is true if and only if at least one of φ or ψ is true
Implication (φ→ψ) is true if and only if φ is false or ψ is true
Equivalence (φ↔ψ) is true if and only if φ and ψ have the same truth value
Quantifiers express properties of elements in the domain of discourse
Universal quantifier (∀xφ(x)) is true if and only if φ(x) is true for all elements in the domain
Example: ∀x(x>0) states that all elements in the domain are greater than zero
Existential quantifier (∃xφ(x)) is true if and only if there exists at least one element in the domain for which φ(x) is true
Example: ∃x(x2=2) states that there exists an element in the domain whose square is equal to two
Quantifier scope extends to the formula immediately following the quantifier, unless parentheses are used to specify a different scope
Nested quantifiers allow for expressing more complex properties involving multiple elements in the domain
Formal Proofs and Inference Rules
Formal proofs are sequences of formulas, each of which is either an axiom or derived from previous formulas using inference rules
Axioms are formulas assumed to be true without proof, serving as the starting points for formal proofs
Inference rules specify how to derive new formulas from existing ones, preserving truth
Modus Ponens (MP) is an inference rule that allows deriving ψ from φ and φ→ψ
Universal Instantiation (UI) allows deriving φ(t) from ∀xφ(x), where t is a term substituted for the variable x
Existential Generalization (EG) allows deriving ∃xφ(x) from φ(t), where t is a term substituted for the variable x
Other inference rules include Modus Tollens, Hypothetical Syllogism, and Resolution
Soundness of an inference rule means that if the premises are true, the conclusion derived using the rule is also true
Completeness of a proof system means that all valid formulas can be derived using the axioms and inference rules of the system
Models and Structures
Models (structures) are mathematical objects that provide an interpretation for the symbols in a first-order language
A model M consists of a non-empty domain D and an interpretation function I that assigns meanings to the symbols in the language
Isomorphic models have the same structure, differing only in the naming of elements in the domain
Elementary equivalence means that two models satisfy the same first-order formulas
Finite models have a finite domain, while infinite models have an infinite domain
Decidability of a theory means there exists an algorithm to determine whether a given formula is true in all models of the theory
Completeness of a theory means that for every formula, either the formula or its negation is provable from the axioms of the theory
Categoricity of a theory means that all models of the theory are isomorphic
Compactness theorem states that if every finite subset of a set of formulas has a model, then the entire set of formulas has a model
Applications and Examples
First-order logic is widely used in mathematics, computer science, and philosophy to formalize and reason about various concepts
Peano arithmetic is a first-order theory that axiomatizes the natural numbers and their properties
Example: ∀x(x+0=x) is an axiom stating that adding zero to any number results in the same number
Set theory (ZFC) is a first-order theory that axiomatizes the principles of sets and their operations
Example: ∀x∀y(∀z(z∈x↔z∈y)→x=y) is the axiom of extensionality, stating that sets with the same elements are equal
Group theory is a first-order theory that axiomatizes the properties of algebraic structures called groups
Example: ∀x∀y∀z((x∗y)∗z=x∗(y∗z)) is the axiom of associativity, stating that the order of applying the group operation does not matter
First-order logic is used in database query languages (SQL) to express constraints and retrieve information from relational databases
Automated theorem provers use first-order logic to prove mathematical theorems and verify the correctness of software and hardware systems
Common Challenges and Tips
Translating natural language statements into first-order logic formulas can be challenging due to ambiguity and implicit assumptions
Tip: Break down complex statements into simpler components and identify the key elements (objects, properties, and relationships)
Choosing the appropriate signature (constant, function, and relation symbols) is crucial for accurately representing the problem domain
Tip: Consider the essential elements and their relationships, and select symbols that capture these aspects concisely
Quantifier ordering and scope can significantly impact the meaning of formulas
Tip: Pay attention to the order of quantifiers and use parentheses to clarify the scope when necessary
Proving validity or unsatisfiability of formulas can be difficult, especially for complex formulas with multiple quantifiers
Tip: Break down the proof into smaller steps, use inference rules strategically, and consider proof by contradiction or contrapositive
Constructing models to show the satisfiability of formulas requires creativity and understanding of the problem domain
Tip: Start with simple models and gradually add complexity, ensuring that the model satisfies the given formulas
Identifying the limitations of first-order logic, such as its inability to express certain concepts like finiteness or transitive closure
Tip: Be aware of the expressive power of first-order logic and consider alternative logics or extensions when necessary
Recognizing the decidability and complexity of first-order theories is important for understanding the feasibility of automated reasoning tasks
Tip: Familiarize yourself with known decidable and undecidable theories, and consider the computational complexity of decision procedures
Applying first-order logic to real-world problems requires careful modeling and interpretation of results
Tip: Collaborate with domain experts to ensure accurate representation and validate the conclusions drawn from logical reasoning