Supreme Court

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Voter suppression

from class:

Supreme Court

Definition

Voter suppression refers to strategies and tactics that aim to discourage or prevent specific groups of people from exercising their right to vote. This often disproportionately affects marginalized communities, including racial minorities, the elderly, and low-income individuals. By creating barriers such as strict voter ID laws, reduced polling places, and purging voter rolls, these actions can undermine the democratic process and electoral participation.

congrats on reading the definition of voter suppression. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Voter suppression tactics can include closing polling places in areas with high minority populations, making it harder for those voters to access the polls.
  2. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 aimed to eliminate many forms of voter suppression, but certain provisions were weakened by the Supreme Court in 2013, allowing states to implement stricter voting laws.
  3. Many states have implemented strict voter ID laws that disproportionately affect marginalized groups, leading to lower voter turnout among these populations.
  4. Online voter registration has been seen as a way to combat voter suppression, making it easier for individuals to register and participate in elections.
  5. Grassroots movements and advocacy organizations play a crucial role in fighting against voter suppression by promoting awareness and mobilizing communities to vote.

Review Questions

  • How do voter suppression tactics impact marginalized communities in terms of their participation in elections?
    • Voter suppression tactics often create barriers that specifically target marginalized communities, including racial minorities and low-income individuals. These barriers can manifest as strict voter ID requirements, reduced access to polling places, or complicated registration processes. As a result, these groups may face significant challenges when trying to vote, leading to lower participation rates and undermining their representation in the electoral process.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in combating voter suppression before and after the 2013 Supreme Court decision.
    • The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was initially effective in reducing voter suppression through provisions like federal oversight of state voting laws and eliminating discriminatory practices. However, the Supreme Court's decision in 2013 significantly weakened these protections by invalidating key components of the law. This led to a resurgence of voter suppression tactics in several states, demonstrating how changes in legal frameworks can directly influence electoral access for marginalized populations.
  • Critically assess the role of grassroots movements in addressing voter suppression and promoting electoral participation among disenfranchised groups.
    • Grassroots movements are vital in combating voter suppression by raising awareness about voting rights issues and mobilizing communities for electoral participation. These movements engage with local populations to educate them on their rights and provide resources for navigating complex voting processes. Moreover, they often advocate for policy changes at the state and national levels to protect voting rights. By fostering a sense of empowerment among disenfranchised groups, grassroots movements help challenge systemic barriers and promote a more inclusive democracy.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides