Social Media and Journalism

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Slander

from class:

Social Media and Journalism

Definition

Slander is the act of making false spoken statements that damage a person's reputation. This form of defamation occurs when someone verbally communicates harmful information that is not true, leading to a negative impact on the individual's social standing or professional life. It's important to understand how slander interacts with issues of free speech, especially in the context of social media, where rapid dissemination of information can amplify the consequences of defamatory remarks.

congrats on reading the definition of slander. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Slander must be proven to be false and damaging to a person's reputation for legal action to be taken.
  2. In many jurisdictions, public figures have a higher burden of proof in slander cases, needing to demonstrate actual malice on the part of the speaker.
  3. Social media has made it easier for slanderous comments to spread quickly, potentially causing more harm before they can be retracted.
  4. Truth is a defense against slander; if the statement can be proven true, it typically cannot be considered defamatory.
  5. Slanderous statements may also lead to civil lawsuits where the injured party can seek damages for harm done to their reputation.

Review Questions

  • What are the key elements that must be proven in a slander case?
    • To establish a case of slander, the plaintiff must demonstrate that a false statement was made about them, that it was communicated to a third party, and that it caused harm to their reputation. Additionally, if the plaintiff is a public figure, they must also prove that the statement was made with actual malice, meaning the speaker knew it was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
  • How does the rise of social media impact the way slander is defined and prosecuted?
    • The rise of social media has significantly impacted slander by allowing statements to spread rapidly and widely, increasing the potential for reputational harm. Because posts can reach large audiences almost instantly, proving damages in slander cases has become more complex. Courts are now tasked with addressing how online platforms can amplify false statements and whether these platforms hold any responsibility for defamatory content shared by users.
  • Evaluate the balance between freedom of speech and protection against slander in modern society.
    • Balancing freedom of speech with protection against slander involves navigating complex legal and ethical considerations. On one hand, free speech is fundamental in a democratic society, allowing individuals to express opinions without fear of censorship. On the other hand, false statements that damage reputations must be addressed to protect individuals from harm. Courts often weigh these interests by establishing standards for what constitutes slander and requiring proof of malice in cases involving public figures, thus attempting to protect both rights.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides