Universal Periodic Review

Definition

The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a unique process established by the United Nations to assess the human rights situations of all UN member states every four years. It involves a review of each state's adherence to human rights obligations and commitments, fostering dialogue and accountability while promoting best practices among countries.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. The UPR was established in 2006 as part of the UN Human Rights Council's efforts to enhance the promotion and protection of human rights worldwide.
2. Each member state is reviewed based on a report compiled by the state itself, information from civil society, and data from other UN entities.
3. The UPR process includes an interactive dialogue between the reviewed state and other member states, allowing for questions, comments, and recommendations.
4. States are expected to report back on the implementation of accepted recommendations during the next review cycle, enhancing accountability.
5. The UPR has been credited with increasing awareness of human rights issues and encouraging states to adopt better practices through international peer pressure.

Review Questions

• How does the Universal Periodic Review enhance the accountability of member states regarding their human rights practices?
  • The Universal Periodic Review enhances accountability by providing a structured framework where each UN member state is evaluated on its human rights record every four years. This process encourages states to address recommendations from other countries and civil society organizations, fostering an environment where states are held responsible for their commitments. By requiring states to report on their progress in implementing accepted recommendations in subsequent reviews, the UPR promotes ongoing scrutiny and improvement in human rights practices.
• Discuss the role of civil society organizations in the Universal Periodic Review process and how they influence state behavior.
  • Civil society organizations play a crucial role in the Universal Periodic Review process by providing valuable information and context regarding human rights conditions within a country. They submit reports that complement the official state report, highlighting issues that may be overlooked or underreported. Their involvement ensures a more comprehensive view of a state's human rights situation, thereby influencing the recommendations made during the review. By advocating for transparency and accountability, civil society organizations can drive change by pressuring governments to take action on accepted recommendations.
• Evaluate the effectiveness of the Universal Periodic Review in improving global human rights standards since its inception in 2006.
  • Since its inception in 2006, the effectiveness of the Universal Periodic Review can be seen in several ways. It has raised awareness of human rights issues across various nations and led to concrete improvements in some states' policies and practices due to peer pressure from other countries. However, challenges remain, such as states selectively accepting recommendations or failing to implement changes. Despite these limitations, the UPR's unique structure promotes dialogue and cooperation among nations, fostering an environment conducive to gradual improvements in global human rights standards.

Related terms

Human Rights Council:

An intergovernmental body within the UN responsible for promoting and protecting human rights around the globe, which oversees the Universal Periodic Review process.

State Obligations:

Legal and moral responsibilities that governments have to uphold human rights as set forth in international treaties and agreements.

Recommendations: Suggestions made during the UPR process for states to improve their human rights records, which they can choose to accept or reject.