Gender and Global Politics

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Obergefell v. Hodges

from class:

Gender and Global Politics

Definition

Obergefell v. Hodges is a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 2015 that legalized same-sex marriage across the United States. The ruling affirmed that the right to marry is a fundamental liberty protected by the Constitution, impacting discussions on equality, human rights, and the legal recognition of diverse relationships.

congrats on reading the definition of Obergefell v. Hodges. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. The Obergefell v. Hodges decision was reached with a 5-4 vote by the Supreme Court, marking a significant moment in the fight for LGBTQ+ equality in the United States.
  2. The case was brought by Jim Obergefell and other plaintiffs who challenged state bans on same-sex marriage, arguing that these laws violated their rights under the Constitution.
  3. The ruling emphasized that marriage is a fundamental right and that denying same-sex couples this right was unconstitutional and discriminatory.
  4. Obergefell v. Hodges built upon previous cases related to LGBTQ+ rights, including United States v. Windsor (2013), which struck down parts of the Defense of Marriage Act.
  5. The impact of this case extended beyond the U.S., influencing global conversations on marriage equality and human rights for LGBTQ+ individuals.

Review Questions

  • How did Obergefell v. Hodges impact the legal status of same-sex marriage in the United States?
    • Obergefell v. Hodges had a profound impact by legally recognizing same-sex marriage across all 50 states, thus ending state-level bans. The Supreme Court ruled that the right to marry is fundamental and protected by both the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This landmark decision not only solidified marriage equality but also influenced public opinion and advocacy efforts related to LGBTQ+ rights.
  • What were some key arguments presented by plaintiffs in Obergefell v. Hodges regarding constitutional protections?
    • The plaintiffs argued that denying them the right to marry violated their constitutional rights to due process and equal protection under the law. They contended that marriage is a fundamental liberty essential to personal dignity and autonomy. Furthermore, they highlighted how state bans on same-sex marriage led to unequal treatment and discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals, challenging the legitimacy of such laws in light of constitutional protections.
  • Evaluate the broader implications of Obergefell v. Hodges on global discussions regarding LGBTQ+ rights and marriage equality.
    • Obergefell v. Hodges set a significant precedent that resonated globally, inspiring activists and policymakers in various countries to advocate for marriage equality and LGBTQ+ rights. The ruling served as a model for legal challenges in other nations where same-sex marriage remained prohibited. Additionally, it sparked discussions about human rights and social justice for marginalized groups worldwide, highlighting how legal recognition can transform societal attitudes toward love and family structure across different cultures.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides