Game Theory

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Agreement

from class:

Game Theory

Definition

An agreement is a mutual understanding between parties that outlines the terms and conditions they accept in order to reach a resolution or outcome. In the context of bargaining, agreements often emerge from negotiations where parties have to navigate their preferences and strategies to find common ground. These agreements can vary significantly based on whether they arise from cooperative or non-cooperative scenarios, affecting how parties achieve their objectives.

congrats on reading the definition of agreement. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Agreements can be formalized through contracts, which legally bind parties to the terms outlined during negotiations.
  2. In cooperative bargaining, agreements often require communication and collaboration between parties to ensure both sides feel satisfied with the outcome.
  3. In non-cooperative bargaining scenarios, reaching an agreement may involve strategic manipulation or competitive tactics, leading to possible conflicts.
  4. The Rubinstein model illustrates how time plays a critical role in forming agreements, as it involves alternating offers between players over time until an agreement is reached.
  5. Agreements can be influenced by external factors such as economic conditions, social norms, and the individual preferences of the negotiating parties.

Review Questions

  • How does the nature of cooperation impact the formation of agreements in bargaining scenarios?
    • The nature of cooperation significantly impacts how agreements are formed during bargaining. In cooperative settings, parties are more likely to communicate openly and work towards mutual benefits, which fosters trust and shared goals. This collaborative approach can lead to agreements that maximize joint welfare, whereas in non-cooperative situations, parties may prioritize individual gains, potentially leading to conflict and suboptimal outcomes.
  • Discuss the implications of the Rubinstein model on the timing of agreement formation between negotiating parties.
    • The Rubinstein model emphasizes that timing plays a crucial role in reaching agreements during negotiations. As time progresses, players make alternating offers which can influence their willingness to concede or compromise. This dynamic creates a strategic environment where each party must consider not only their preferences but also the timing of their offers, as delays may reduce the perceived value of an agreement or lead to a breakdown in negotiations altogether.
  • Evaluate how changes in external economic conditions could affect the likelihood of reaching an agreement in bargaining processes.
    • Changes in external economic conditions can significantly influence the likelihood of reaching an agreement in bargaining processes. For instance, during economic downturns, parties may become more risk-averse and less willing to compromise, making agreements harder to achieve. Conversely, in a thriving economy with ample resources, there may be greater motivation for collaboration and flexibility in negotiations. Thus, understanding these external factors is essential for parties aiming to negotiate effective agreements.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides