upgrade

🎟️intro to american government review

key term - Benghazi Hearings

Citation:

Definition

The Benghazi hearings refer to a series of congressional investigations and hearings conducted in the United States regarding the 2012 attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya. These hearings were focused on examining the events leading up to the attack, the government's response during the attack, and the aftermath and handling of the situation by the Obama administration.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. The Benghazi attack on September 11, 2012, resulted in the deaths of four American citizens, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens.
  2. The Benghazi hearings were conducted by several congressional committees, including the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the House Select Committee on Benghazi.
  3. The hearings examined the security measures in place at the Benghazi compound, the response of the Obama administration during the attack, and the subsequent investigation and handling of the incident.
  4. The Benghazi hearings highlighted issues related to the Diplomatic Security Service's ability to provide adequate protection for U.S. diplomatic personnel and facilities in high-risk areas.
  5. The Accountability Review Board (ARB) investigation, conducted in the aftermath of the Benghazi attack, identified security lapses and made recommendations to improve diplomatic security.

Review Questions

  • Explain how the Benghazi hearings relate to the institutional design of Congress and its role in overseeing the executive branch.
    • The Benghazi hearings were a prime example of Congress exercising its constitutional power of oversight over the executive branch. As part of the institutional design of the federal government, Congress has the authority to investigate and scrutinize the actions of the executive branch, including the State Department and other agencies. The Benghazi hearings allowed Congress to examine the security measures, decision-making, and response of the Obama administration in the aftermath of the Benghazi attack, holding the executive branch accountable for its handling of the situation.
  • Analyze how the Benghazi hearings highlighted the challenges in controlling the bureaucracy, specifically the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS).
    • The Benghazi hearings revealed the difficulties in controlling the bureaucracy, particularly the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS), which is responsible for protecting U.S. diplomatic personnel and facilities abroad. The hearings highlighted issues related to the DSS's ability to provide adequate security measures, resource allocation, and coordination with other government agencies. The findings from the Accountability Review Board investigation also pointed to lapses in the DSS's performance, underscoring the challenges Congress and the executive branch face in effectively overseeing and controlling the operations of this specialized diplomatic security agency.
  • Evaluate the long-term impact of the Benghazi hearings on the relationship between Congress and the executive branch in terms of oversight and accountability.
    • The Benghazi hearings had a significant impact on the ongoing dynamic between Congress and the executive branch regarding oversight and accountability. The extensive investigations and public scrutiny of the Obama administration's handling of the Benghazi attack highlighted the tension and power struggle between the legislative and executive branches. The hearings reinforced Congress's role in holding the executive branch accountable for its actions and decisions, particularly in matters of national security and foreign policy. This heightened level of congressional oversight and the political divisions surrounding the Benghazi incident have contributed to a more adversarial relationship between the two branches, with lasting implications for how they navigate issues of transparency, information-sharing, and the boundaries of their respective powers.