Business Law

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Trust-Busting

from class:

Business Law

Definition

Trust-busting refers to the government's efforts to break up large monopolistic corporations, known as 'trusts,' in order to promote competition and protect consumers. This practice gained prominence in the early 20th century as a response to the growing power of big businesses that were stifling competition and exploiting consumers.

congrats on reading the definition of Trust-Busting. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was a landmark piece of legislation that empowered the federal government to take legal action against monopolistic practices and unfair competition.
  2. President Theodore Roosevelt, known as the 'Trust Buster,' led a vigorous campaign to break up large corporate monopolies and promote a more competitive business environment.
  3. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), established in 1914, was tasked with enforcing antitrust laws and investigating unfair or deceptive business practices.
  4. The Clayton Act of 1914 strengthened antitrust laws by prohibiting certain business practices, such as price discrimination and mergers that substantially lessened competition.
  5. The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Standard Oil Co. v. United States (1911) set a precedent for the government's ability to dismantle large, monopolistic corporations.

Review Questions

  • Explain the role of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the context of trust-busting efforts.
    • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was established in 1914 as a key player in the government's trust-busting efforts. The FTC was tasked with enforcing antitrust laws, such as the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Clayton Act, by investigating and taking legal action against monopolistic practices and unfair business behaviors. The FTC's mandate was to promote competition and protect consumers from the harmful effects of corporate monopolies and anti-competitive practices.
  • Analyze the significance of the Supreme Court's decision in Standard Oil Co. v. United States (1911) in the context of trust-busting.
    • The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Standard Oil Co. v. United States (1911) was a pivotal moment in the trust-busting movement. The Court ruled that the Standard Oil Company had violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by engaging in monopolistic practices, and ordered the company to be broken up into smaller, independent entities. This decision established a legal precedent that empowered the government to dismantle large, dominant corporations that were stifling competition and harming consumers. The Standard Oil case demonstrated the federal government's willingness to use its antitrust powers to challenge and dismantle powerful corporate monopolies.
  • Evaluate the long-term impact of the trust-busting efforts on the American economy and consumer welfare.
    • The trust-busting efforts of the early 20th century, led by figures like President Theodore Roosevelt, had a significant and lasting impact on the American economy and consumer welfare. By breaking up large, monopolistic corporations and promoting competition, the government's trust-busting initiatives helped to foster a more dynamic and innovative business environment. This, in turn, led to lower prices, improved product quality, and greater consumer choice. The establishment of antitrust laws and the empowerment of regulatory agencies like the Federal Trade Commission set the stage for ongoing efforts to maintain a fair and competitive marketplace, which has been crucial for protecting consumer interests and ensuring the long-term health of the American economy.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides