key term - Opinionated Argumentative Source

Definition

An opinionated argumentative source is a type of resource that presents a clear stance on an issue, often using persuasive language and emotional appeals to support its claims. These sources can influence readers' perceptions and are typically rooted in the author's personal beliefs or experiences. They may include editorials, opinion pieces, or commentary articles that aim to convince the audience of a particular viewpoint.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Opinionated argumentative sources often rely on emotional appeals, which can resonate strongly with audiences but may lack objective evidence.
2. These sources can shape public opinion and influence policy decisions by presenting persuasive arguments in favor of specific viewpoints.
3. It's essential to critically evaluate opinionated argumentative sources for potential biases and to understand the author's background and motivations.
4. While opinionated argumentative sources are valuable for understanding different perspectives, they should be balanced with factual and research-based sources for a well-rounded view.
5. Identifying the target audience of these sources can help determine their effectiveness and the strategies used by the author to persuade that audience.

Review Questions

• How does an opinionated argumentative source differ from a neutral or factual source?
  • An opinionated argumentative source explicitly takes a stance on an issue and seeks to persuade the reader through emotional appeals and personal beliefs, whereas a neutral or factual source presents information without bias or subjective influence. This difference is crucial because it affects how the information is interpreted and whether it is perceived as credible. Understanding this distinction helps readers critically analyze the information they encounter.
• What are some techniques authors use in opinionated argumentative sources to persuade their audience?
  • Authors of opinionated argumentative sources often use techniques such as emotional appeals, rhetorical questions, and anecdotal evidence to connect with readers and strengthen their arguments. They may also employ strong, assertive language to convey confidence in their position. By understanding these persuasive techniques, readers can better assess the strength and validity of the arguments presented.
• Evaluate the impact of opinionated argumentative sources on public discourse and policymaking in contemporary society.
  • Opinionated argumentative sources play a significant role in shaping public discourse by influencing how issues are perceived and debated among individuals and communities. Their persuasive nature can mobilize public sentiment and lead to shifts in policy, particularly when they resonate with widespread beliefs or emotions. However, reliance on these sources can also polarize discussions and hinder constructive dialogue by emphasizing divisions rather than common ground.

Related terms

Bias:

A tendency to favor one perspective or interpretation over others, often resulting in a lack of objectivity.

Credibility:

The quality of being trusted and believed in, which is crucial when evaluating the reliability of sources.

Argumentation: The process of presenting reasons and evidence to support a specific claim or position in a debate or discussion.