AP US Government

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Eliminated

from class:

AP US Government

Definition

Eliminated refers to the process of removing or getting rid of something, often in a systematic or organized manner. In the context of governance and political discourse, it can relate to the removal of certain powers, institutions, or influences that are deemed problematic or undesirable, which is particularly relevant in discussions around congressional behavior and the tension between factions.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. In Federalist No. 10, James Madison argues that a large republic can help eliminate the negative effects of factions by diluting their influence across a diverse population.
  2. Brutus 1 raises concerns about the potential for a powerful central government to eliminate state authority, leading to a loss of local control and representation.
  3. Congressional behavior can involve eliminating certain legislative proposals through committee decisions or majority votes, shaping the policy landscape significantly.
  4. Eliminating partisanship and fostering bipartisan cooperation is often viewed as essential for effective governance, especially in Congress.
  5. The process of eliminating barriers to voting and participation is crucial for enhancing democratic engagement and representation in a diverse society.

Review Questions

  • How does Madison's argument in Federalist No. 10 address the issue of factions potentially being eliminated in a large republic?
    • Madison argues that a large republic can mitigate the effects of factions by creating a wide array of interests that would prevent any single faction from dominating. The diversity within a larger population makes it less likely for a majority faction to emerge and impose its will on others. By diffusing power across various groups, the potential negative impact of factions can be effectively eliminated, leading to more stable governance.
  • What are the implications of Brutus 1's concerns regarding the elimination of state authority by a strong central government?
    • Brutus 1 highlights fears that a powerful central government could eliminate state sovereignty and reduce local representation. The argument emphasizes that consolidating power at the national level could lead to decisions that do not reflect the specific needs and interests of individual states. This concern points to the importance of maintaining a balance between state and federal powers to ensure adequate representation and responsiveness to local populations.
  • Evaluate the role of eliminating partisan gridlock in Congress and its impact on effective governance.
    • Eliminating partisan gridlock is crucial for ensuring that Congress can function effectively and respond to pressing national issues. When political polarization leads to obstructionist behavior, it hampers the legislative process and delays important policies from being enacted. By fostering bipartisanship and cooperation among lawmakers, Congress can overcome obstacles and make meaningful progress on issues like healthcare, infrastructure, and economic reform, ultimately benefiting citizens who rely on governmental action.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.