All Study Guides Business Economics Unit 7
💹 Business Economics Unit 7 – Game Theory & Strategic DecisionsGame theory analyzes strategic interactions between rational decision-makers. It explores concepts like players, strategies, payoffs, and types of games. Understanding these elements helps predict outcomes in various scenarios, from poker to business competition.
Nash equilibrium is a key concept where no player benefits from changing strategy. Game theory applications include market competition, voting behavior, and international relations. Decision trees and extensive form games visually represent sequential decision-making processes in strategic interactions.
Key Concepts in Game Theory
Game theory analyzes strategic interactions between rational decision-makers
Players are the individuals or groups making decisions in a game
Strategies are the complete plans of action that players can choose
Payoffs are the outcomes or rewards that players receive based on the strategies chosen
Zero-sum games have a fixed total payoff that is divided among the players (Poker)
Non-zero-sum games allow for outcomes where all players can gain or lose (Prisoner's Dilemma)
Simultaneous games involve players making decisions at the same time without knowledge of others' choices
Sequential games involve players making decisions in a specific order, aware of previous choices
Types of Games and Strategies
Static games are played simultaneously, where players choose their strategies without knowing the choices of other players
Dynamic games are played sequentially, where players take turns making decisions based on the moves of other players
Cooperative games allow players to communicate and form binding agreements to coordinate their strategies
Non-cooperative games do not allow for enforceable agreements, and players make independent decisions
Pure strategies are specific actions that a player chooses to take in a game (Always confess in Prisoner's Dilemma)
Mixed strategies involve randomly selecting among available pure strategies based on a probability distribution
Dominant strategies are the best choice for a player regardless of the strategies chosen by other players
Dominated strategies are those that always lead to worse payoffs compared to other available strategies
Nash Equilibrium and Its Applications
Nash equilibrium is a state where each player's strategy is the best response to the strategies of other players
In Nash equilibrium, no player has an incentive to unilaterally change their strategy
Nash equilibrium can be pure (players choose specific strategies) or mixed (players randomize their strategies)
Existence of Nash equilibrium depends on the type of game and the number of players
Nash equilibrium helps predict the outcomes of strategic interactions in various fields (Economics, political science, psychology)
Applications of Nash equilibrium include market competition, voting behavior, and international relations
Nash equilibrium may not always be the most efficient or socially optimal outcome (Prisoner's Dilemma)
Refinements of Nash equilibrium, such as subgame perfect equilibrium, address dynamic games and credible threats
Decision trees visually represent the sequential structure of a game
Nodes in a decision tree represent decision points for players or chance events
Branches in a decision tree represent the available choices or outcomes at each node
Payoffs are listed at the terminal nodes of the decision tree
Extensive form games are represented using decision trees, capturing the order of moves and information available to players
Backward induction is used to solve extensive form games by starting at the terminal nodes and working backwards
Subgame perfect equilibrium is determined by finding the Nash equilibrium at each subgame (portion of the game tree)
Extensive form games can model situations with imperfect information, where players are unaware of some previous moves
Dominant and Mixed Strategies
Dominant strategy equilibrium occurs when each player has a dominant strategy, resulting in a Nash equilibrium
Iterated elimination of dominated strategies can be used to simplify games and find dominant strategy equilibria
Mixed strategy equilibrium involves players randomizing their strategies based on specific probabilities
In a mixed strategy equilibrium, players are indifferent between their available pure strategies
Mixed strategies can be used to exploit opponents' tendencies and avoid being predictable
Calculating mixed strategy equilibria involves finding probabilities that make players indifferent between strategies
Mixed strategies are common in competitive settings (Sports, poker, business competition)
Mixed strategy equilibria may not always exist, depending on the structure of the game
Cooperative vs. Non-Cooperative Games
Cooperative games allow players to communicate, form coalitions, and make binding agreements
In cooperative games, players can negotiate and distribute payoffs among themselves
Shapley value is a solution concept for cooperative games that assigns fair payoffs to players based on their marginal contributions
Core is another solution concept that ensures no group of players has an incentive to break away from the grand coalition
Non-cooperative games do not allow for enforceable agreements, and players make independent decisions
In non-cooperative games, players cannot credibly commit to strategies that are not in their individual best interests
Nash equilibrium is the primary solution concept for non-cooperative games
Many real-world situations involve a combination of cooperative and non-cooperative elements (International treaties, business partnerships)
Game Theory in Business Contexts
Game theory helps businesses make strategic decisions in competitive markets
Oligopoly models, such as Cournot and Bertrand competition, analyze firm behavior in concentrated industries
Price wars can be modeled as a Prisoner's Dilemma, where firms have incentives to undercut each other
Product differentiation and market segmentation can be analyzed using game-theoretic frameworks
Entry deterrence strategies, such as limit pricing and capacity expansion, can be studied using extensive form games
Bargaining and negotiation situations, such as labor-management disputes, can be modeled using cooperative game theory
Auctions and bidding behavior can be analyzed using game-theoretic concepts (First-price sealed-bid auction, Vickrey auction)
Game theory helps businesses anticipate competitor moves and make strategic investments
Advanced Topics and Real-World Applications
Repeated games involve players interacting over multiple rounds, allowing for cooperation and punishment strategies
Evolutionary game theory studies the dynamics of strategy adoption in populations over time
Signaling games model situations where players have private information and can send costly signals to convey their types
Mechanism design involves creating game rules and incentives to achieve desired outcomes (Auctions, voting systems)
Behavioral game theory incorporates insights from psychology and relaxes assumptions of perfect rationality
Experimental game theory tests theoretical predictions using controlled laboratory experiments
Game theory has applications in various fields beyond economics (Biology, computer science, political science)
Real-world applications include spectrum auctions, kidney exchange programs, and climate change negotiations